Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM-5
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-5ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 53/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| GLM-5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 34/100 | 40/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.44/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Output
$1.32/ 1M
$2.69/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
21
0
Completed sessions
5,481
0
Token share
97.2%
0%
Tokens
6B+1,497,422%
00%
AUG 28OCT 22
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5·Jamba Mini