Compare AI models: GLM-4.6 vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.6ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.3Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 77/100 | 43/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 76/100 |
| GLM-5.3 | 85/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
205K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.60/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$2.20/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.11/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGLM-4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGLM-4.6 vs Jamba MiniGLM-4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3·Jamba Mini