Compare AI models: DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V3.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 64/100 | 43/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 78/100 | 100/100 | 33/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
164K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.25/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Output
$0.95/ 1M
$3.96/ 1M
Cached input
$0.13/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V3.1·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V3.1 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V3.1·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba Large